Crossbench
ApprovedCurrentEvent
Title

Conservative MPs and former ministers defect to Reform UK

Date
12–26 January 2026
Relevant topic(s)
Political partiesEstablished political partiesPolitical partiesEmerging and minor UK political partiesPolitical partiesPolitical partiesDemocracy and participationDirect and representative democracy

What happened?

In January 2026 several senior Conservatives moved to Reform UK. The former Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, no longer an MP, joined on 12 January. Three days later Kemi Badenoch dismissed Robert Jenrick from the shadow cabinet and removed the whip, saying she had evidence that he was planning to defect; he joined Reform the same evening. The Romford MP Andrew Rosindell followed on 18 January and the former Home Secretary Suella Braverman on 26 January.

Jenrick, Rosindell and Braverman kept their seats as Reform UK MPs, alongside Danny Kruger, who had defected in September 2025; Braverman later said she would not call a by-election. A petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs change party passed 100,000 signatures and was debated by MPs in March 2026; the government said it had no plans to change the rules.

  • Danny Kruger, MP for East Wiltshire, left the Conservatives for Reform UK on 15 September 2025, the first sitting Conservative MP to do so.
  • Nadhim Zahawi, a former Chancellor, announced on 12 January 2026 that he had joined Reform UK. He was no longer an MP: in May 2024 he had announced that he would not stand at the next general election.
  • On 15 January 2026 Kemi Badenoch dismissed Robert Jenrick as shadow justice secretary, removed the Conservative whip and suspended his party membership, saying she had “irrefutable evidence” that he was planning in secret to defect.
  • Nigel Farage announced at a Reform UK event that evening that Jenrick had joined the party. Jenrick argued that the Conservatives lacked the stomach for the radical change he believed was needed.
  • On 18 January 2026 Andrew Rosindell, MP for Romford, resigned as a shadow foreign affairs minister and left the Conservatives for Reform UK, citing the party’s handling of the Chagos Islands. This was reported to give Reform seven MPs.
  • On 26 January 2026 Suella Braverman, a former Home Secretary, was presented as a Reform UK MP at a press conference in Westminster. A Conservative Party statement said it had always been “a matter of when, not if” she would defect.
  • UK Parliament’s members pages list Robert Jenrick (Newark) and Suella Braverman (Fareham and Waterlooville) as Reform UK MPs who have sat continuously since 2014 and 2015 respectively, so neither has faced a by-election since changing party.
  • At the last check, UK Parliament’s state of the parties showed Reform UK with 8 of the 650 Commons seats and the Conservatives with 116.
  • The Institute for Government reported that five of Reform UK’s eight MPs were former Conservative MPs.
  • Reform UK said it would stop admitting current and former MPs and councillors who defected after the local elections on 7 May 2026.
  • The Conservative Party chairman, Kevin Hollinrake, said a by-election in Jenrick’s seat would be “the right thing to do”.
  • A petition calling for automatic by-elections when MPs defect gained 129,335 signatures. The government replied on 9 February 2026 that voters choose individual candidates rather than parties, and that it had no plans to change the current arrangements.
  • MPs debated the petition in Westminster Hall on 16 March 2026. For the government, the Minister without Portfolio, Anna Turley, argued that recall is triggered by an MP’s conduct, “not a change in values”.
  • In September 2026 Braverman said she would not call a by-election in her seat, arguing: “I haven’t actually changed my politics.”
Conservative MPs and former ministers joining Reform UK
  1. 15 September 2025Danny Kruger MP joins Reform UK
  2. 12 January 2026Former Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi (not an MP) joins Reform UK
  3. 15 January 2026Robert Jenrick MP loses the Conservative whip and joins Reform UK
  4. 18 January 2026Andrew Rosindell MP joins Reform UK
  5. 26 January 2026Suella Braverman MP joins Reform UK

Why is it politically significant?

The defections show divisions inside an established party after a heavy election defeat, and an emerging party drawing on its experienced politicians. Three sitting Conservative MPs, two of them frontbenchers, left within eleven days, and five of Reform UK’s eight MPs were formerly Conservatives. The episode also shows a leader using the whip and party membership to discipline an MP.

It raises a question about representation: whether voters elect a person or a party. The government and the defectors argue that MPs are elected as individuals and may change party; supporters of the petition and some Conservatives argue that a by-election is needed so that constituents can give a new mandate.

How to use

Which arguments does it support?

Established parties are weakened by internal divisions

Reasoning
Disagreement over a party’s direction can lead senior figures to leave for a rival.
Evidence
Three sitting Conservative MPs, including two members of the front bench, moved to Reform UK in January 2026.
How it supports the argument
The Opposition lost MPs and former ministers to a party competing for the same voters.

Emerging parties can challenge the established parties

Reasoning
A growing party can attract experienced politicians as well as voters.
Evidence
Reform UK reached eight MPs, five of them former Conservatives, and recruited a former Chancellor and a former Home Secretary.
How it supports the argument
Defections gave Reform more MPs and senior figures without winning new seats at an election.

MPs are representatives, not delegates

Reasoning
In the UK system voters elect an individual MP, who is free to use their own judgment.
Evidence
The government said voters choose individual candidates and that changing party does not require a by-election.
How it supports the argument
MPs who changed party kept their seats until the next general election unless they chose to resign.

Which counterarguments exist?

A different conclusion

Voters choose parties, not just people

Supporters of automatic by-elections, including the petition’s 129,335 signatories and the Conservative chairman Kevin Hollinrake, argue that most people vote for a party, so an MP who changes party should seek a new mandate. In 2014 Douglas Carswell and Mark Reckless resigned to re-contest their seats when they joined UKIP.

Alternative view

Reform remains a small party in the Commons

Even after the defections Reform UK held 8 of the 650 Commons seats, against 116 for the Conservatives, and none of the MPs who joined it by defecting was elected as a Reform candidate.

Other explanations

Dismissing Jenrick can be seen as a show of leadership

Badenoch presented the removal of the whip as something she “had to do” once she learned of the plan, and the Conservative Party said Braverman’s departure had long been expected. On this view, the losses reflect individual decisions rather than a collapse of the party.

Limits of the evidence

Defections do not show voters’ views

A change of party by MPs shows what politicians think of a party’s prospects, not how voters will behave. Elections and polls are needed to judge whether support has moved.

Concepts and connections

Sources and verification

Event12–26 January 2026
Added to bank8 November 2026
Last checked8 November 2026
Next check due8 May 2027
  1. 1
    Publisher Express & Star (PA Media)Published 2025-09-15Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  2. 2
    Publisher ITV NewsPublished 2026-01-12Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  3. 7
    Publisher ITV News CentralPublished 2024-05-09Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  4. 3
    Publisher Associated Press (via The Washington Times)Published 2026-01-15Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  5. 4
    Publisher STV NewsPublished 2026-01-15Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  6. 13
    Publisher LBCPublished 2026-01-15Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  7. 5
    Publisher ITV NewsPublished 2026-01-18Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  8. 8
    Publisher Shropshire StarPublished 2026-01-18Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  9. 6
    Publisher Associated Press (via WSLS)Published 2026-01-26Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  10. 9
    Publisher UK ParliamentPublished 2026-11-08Type OfficialChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  11. 10
    Publisher UK ParliamentPublished 2026-11-08Type OfficialChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  12. 11
    Publisher UK ParliamentPublished 2026-11-08Type DataChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  13. 12
    Publisher Institute for GovernmentPublished 2026-01-29Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  14. 14
    Publisher UK Parliament PetitionsPublished 2026-02-09Type OfficialChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  15. 15
    Publisher Parallel Parliament (Hansard text)Published 2026-03-16Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  16. 16
    Publisher Parallel Parliament (Hansard text)Published 2026-03-16Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  17. 17
    Publisher ITV News MeridianPublished 2026-09-04Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check

About this example

Is it still current?

Current

The facts and their significance still stand.

Why it is in the bank

A recent, well-documented example of divisions in an established party and the growth of an emerging one, which also links to debates about representation.

  • ✓Relevance to the specification
  • PartlyStrength and reliability of the evidenceMost dates and statements come from news reports; UK Parliament’s members pages confirm current party but do not show the dates of the changes. The Westminster Hall debate is cited from a site reproducing Hansard, as Hansard itself could not be opened in this run.
  • ✓Importance to a wider political debate
  • ✓Usefulness in evaluative essays
  • ✓Connections to other topics
  • ✓Sufficiently current
  • ✓Adds something new to the bank

Editorial status

Approved

Signed off for students.

Origin: Human-written · Reviewer: Editor

Every fact on this page has been checked against original sources.