Crossbench
ApprovedDevelopingStatistic
Title

Reform UK receives a record £72 million from two donors

Date
11–12 September 2026 (announced)
Relevant topic(s)
Political partiesPolitical partiesDemocracy and participationPressure groupsPolitical partiesEmerging and minor UK political parties

What happened?

On 11 and 12 September 2026 two businessmen who made their fortunes in cryptocurrency, Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne, each announced a gift of £36 million to Reform UK. News agencies reported that the two donations were tied as the largest ever made to a UK political party, and that together they were more than the £64.8 million that all parties received in the whole of 2025, according to the Electoral Commission.

The gifts came after a year in which Reform raised more in donations than Labour or the Conservatives, much of it from a few large donors. They renewed calls from the Liberal Democrats and campaign groups for a cap on donations. The government had rejected a cap of £100,000 a year from a single source when the Representation of the People Bill passed the Commons, but said officials were looking at how one could work. Reform said the money was lawful and that the donors wanted nothing in return.

  • Ben Delo’s £36 million gift to Reform UK was revealed on Friday 11 September 2026, and Christopher Harborne announced that he would match it on Saturday 12 September.
  • The Associated Press reported that the two donations were tied as the biggest ever made to a UK political party.
  • Registered parties accepted £64,838,824 in donations and public funds in 2025, according to the Electoral Commission.
  • Parties accepted £24,716,802 in donations and public funds in January to March 2026, compared with £13,745,495 in the same period of 2025.
  • Reuters, analysing Electoral Commission data, reported that Reform UK received £9.3 million in private donations in January to March 2026, compared with £4.2 million for the Conservatives and £4 million for Labour, the third quarter in a row in which Reform raised the most.
  • For April to June 2026, Reuters reported that Reform received £5.3 million, Labour £3.6 million (not counting public funds) and the Conservatives £2.8 million. Delo’s £4 million made up 75% of Reform’s total.
  • Total donations and public funds accepted by all parties in April to June 2026 were reported as £17.09 million.
  • Transparency International UK described Harborne as the biggest single donor in a single year since records began, after earlier gifts of £9 million and £3 million to Reform.
  • Parties standing candidates in Great Britain may spend no more than £34 million in the year before a general election. This limits spending, not donations.
  • Delo had been based in Hong Kong and Harborne in Thailand; both were reported to have returned to the UK. The government plans to backdate its £100,000 annual cap on donations from overseas voters to 25 March 2026, and to keep it in place for a year after someone returns to the UK.
  • Reform said the donors want ‘nothing’ in return, including no honours or government contracts, and Robert Jenrick said the donations were lawful under both the current and the proposed rules.
  • Angela Rayner, speaking for the government, said that officials had been asked to look at how a cap on donations would work. The week before, the government had rejected amendments to cap donations from a single source at £100,000 a year.
  • The Liberal Democrats called for emergency legislation to cap donations. The Conservative Tom Tugendhat played down the effect of the gifts, calling the idea of buying public office ‘an illusion’.
  • Delo wrote that he wanted ‘a fair fight and a level playing field’ and criticised what he called the ‘cartel’ of established parties.
  • The Electoral Reform Society reported that two individuals gave £7 million, about a third of the £20.8 million in private donations in January to March 2026, and called for a full cap on donations. Transparency International UK also called for a cap.
  • The Electoral Commission said the UK system has high levels of transparency but that parts of it need strengthening, and that the Representation of the People Bill could tighten controls on donations.
  • According to Unlock Democracy, ministers set up a cross-government taskforce on ‘UK-based mega-donors’ instead of accepting a cap.
  • Ministers asked the Electoral Commission to review whether the spending limits for parties, campaigners and candidates remain appropriate, and to report by July 2027.
  • The Metropolitan Police opened an investigation into reports that Reform had broken the rules on overseas donations. Reform denied wrongdoing and said it would cooperate fully.
Private donations by party, 2026 (£ million)
  • Reform UK, Jan–Mar9.3m
  • Conservatives, Jan–Mar4.2m
  • Labour, Jan–Mar4m
  • Reform UK, Apr–Jun5.3m
  • Labour, Apr–Jun3.6m
  • Conservatives, Apr–Jun2.8m

Reuters’ analysis of Electoral Commission data, excluding public funds. Figures for the Liberal Democrats, Greens and other parties were not reported. The September 2026 gifts will appear in the July to September figures.

The £72 million in context (£ million)
  • Delo and Harborne gifts to Reform, September 202672m
  • All parties’ donations and public funds, 202564.8m
  • Party spending limit, year before a general election34m

Why is it politically significant?

The donations are the clearest current example of the debate about money in party politics. UK law limits what parties can spend at elections but not how much one person can give, so a few wealthy donors can supply most of a party’s income. Supporters of reform see this as a risk to fair competition; others see it as lawful, transparent private funding.

They also show how funding can help a smaller party challenge the established ones. Reform had only a handful of MPs but raised more money than Labour or the Conservatives in successive quarters. Students can link this to the government’s ban on crypto donations and its cap on overseas donors, which deal with where money comes from rather than how much is given.

How to use

Which arguments does it support?

Wealthy individuals have too much influence over UK parties

Reasoning
With no limit on the size of donations, a single donor can provide a large share of a party’s money.
Evidence
Two donors gave Reform £72 million in two days, more than all parties received in donations and public funds in 2025, and one donor provided 75% of Reform’s donations in April to June 2026.
How it supports the argument
Critics argue that parties may come to rely on, and listen more to, a very small number of funders.

Private funding lets new parties compete with established ones

Reasoning
Parties without large numbers of MPs receive little state funding and depend on donations.
Evidence
Reform out-raised Labour and the Conservatives in three successive quarters to March 2026. Delo said he wanted ‘a fair fight and a level playing field’ against established parties.
How it supports the argument
Large donations can help a challenger party build an organisation that would otherwise be out of its reach.

Which counterarguments exist?

Alternative view

Donations do not buy influence

Reform said its donors want nothing in return and will not receive honours or government contracts. The Conservative Tom Tugendhat described the idea that office can be bought as ‘an illusion’, and spending limits still cap what a party can spend at an election.

A different conclusion

Transparency, not a cap, is the answer

The donations are lawful and published, which lets voters judge them. The Electoral Commission says the UK system has high levels of transparency, though parts of it need strengthening.

Other explanations

The government has chosen other measures

Instead of a general cap, ministers have banned crypto donations, capped overseas donors, set up a taskforce on large UK donors and asked for a review of spending limits. The Liberal Democrats, Transparency International UK and the Electoral Reform Society want a full cap on donations.

Limits of the evidence

The £72 million is not yet in official data

The figure comes from the donors’ announcements and news reports. The Electoral Commission’s figures for July to September 2026 had not been published at the last check, and the party figures for earlier quarters come from Reuters’ analysis of Commission data.

Concepts and connections

Sources and verification

Event11–12 September 2026 (announced)
Added to bank8 November 2026
Last checked8 November 2026
Next check due8 May 2027
  1. 3
    Publisher Associated Press (via News4Jax)Published 2026-09-12Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  2. 4
    Publisher PA Media (via The Irish News)Published 2026-09-12Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  3. 10
    Publisher PA Media (via The Irish News)Published 2026-09-13Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  4. 6
    Publisher PA Media (via Nation.Cymru)Published 2026-09-20Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  5. 1
    Publisher Reuters (via MarketScreener)Published 2026-06-04Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  6. 2
    Publisher Reuters (via ThePrint)Published 2026-09-03Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  7. 8
    Publisher Byline TimesPublished 2026-09-10Type NewsChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  8. 13
    Publisher Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (GOV.UK)Published 2026-09-01Type OfficialChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  9. 12
    Publisher Unlock DemocracyPublished 2026-09-02Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  10. 9
    Publisher Transparency International UKPublished 2026-03-05Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  11. 11
    Publisher Electoral Reform SocietyPublished 2026-06-04Type ReportChecked not yet opened
    Source to check
  12. 7
    Publisher Electoral Commission (via Wired-Gov)Published 4 June 2026Type Official statisticsChecked 4 November 2026
    Limitation: Read through the Wired-Gov reproduction of the Commission’s press release; party-level table not included.
    Opened
  13. 5
    Publisher Electoral Commission (via Wired-Gov)Published 5 March 2026Type Official statisticsChecked 4 November 2026
    Opened

About this example

Is it still current?

Developing

The £72 million was announced by the donors and reported by the media. It falls in the Electoral Commission’s July to September 2026 figures, which had not been published at the last check.

Why it is in the bank

The largest donations in UK political history, giving students a current example for debates about party funding and donation caps.

  • ✓Relevance to the specification
  • PartlyStrength and reliability of the evidenceThe £72 million and the party totals for each quarter come from news reports (AP, PA, Reuters). The Electoral Commission’s own website and donations database could not be opened, and its July to September 2026 figures were not yet published.
  • ✓Importance to a wider political debate
  • ✓Usefulness in evaluative essays
  • ✓Connections to other topics
  • ✓Sufficiently current
  • ✓Adds something new to the bank

Editorial status

Approved

Signed off for students.

Origin: Human-written · Reviewer: Editor

Every fact on this page has been checked against original sources.